<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Travel &#38; Tweet &#187; us airways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://travelandtweet.com/tag/us-airways/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://travelandtweet.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US Air Carriers Way Behind their International Peers</title>
		<link>http://travelandtweet.com/2009/09/us-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers</link>
		<comments>http://travelandtweet.com/2009/09/us-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Traveler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us airways]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://travelandtweet.com/2009/09/us-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My current trip to Europe started off vasty different than my previous trip. You see this time, I am flying to Lisbon first, then I will travel through the rest of my itinerary in Europe. As you may or may not know, getting a direct flight from Los Angeles to Lisbon is not possible. In fact, most European destinations are not accessible via a direct flight from Los Angeles. In any case, last year, I flew direct to London and started my trip there. But even more importantly, I flew Air New Zealand versus this time when I flew US Airways. Let me just say, the difference between the two carriers is night and day. Now. Don&#8217;t know how Air NZ&#8217;s local flights within Kiwiland are, but I am comparing my international Los Angeles to Europe experience. Basic differences: 1) Air NZ was a Boeing 777 compared to US Airways smaller Boeing 757. 2) NZ had a personal TV for each passenger. US had no TV on the first leg from LA to Philly and a cental TV or the second leg to Lisbon. The entertainment? Try the worst movie I have seen this year; Duplicity! 3) Meals &#8211; sigh. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><div class='shareaholic-like-buttonset' style='float:none;height:30px;'><a class='shareaholic-fblike' data-shr_layout='button_count' data-shr_showfaces='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Ftravelandtweet.com%2F2009%2F09%2Fus-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers.html' data-shr_title='US+Air+Carriers+Way+Behind+their+International+Peers'></a><a class='shareaholic-googleplusone' data-shr_size='medium' data-shr_count='false' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Ftravelandtweet.com%2F2009%2F09%2Fus-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers.html' data-shr_title='US+Air+Carriers+Way+Behind+their+International+Peers'></a><a class='shareaholic-tweetbutton' data-shr_count='none' data-shr_href='http%3A%2F%2Ftravelandtweet.com%2F2009%2F09%2Fus-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers.html' data-shr_title='US+Air+Carriers+Way+Behind+their+International+Peers'></a></div><div style="clear: both; min-height: 1px; height: 3px; width: 100%;"></div><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>My current trip to Europe started off vasty different than my previous trip. You see this time, I am flying to Lisbon first, then I will travel through the rest of my itinerary in Europe. As you may or may not know, getting a direct flight from Los Angeles to Lisbon is not possible. In fact, most European destinations are not accessible via a direct flight from Los Angeles. In any case, last year, I flew <a title="Air New Zealand Direct from LAX to London" href="http://travelandtweet.com/2009/08/air-new-zealand-lax-to-london.html" target="_self">direct to London</a> and started my trip there. But even more importantly, I flew Air New Zealand versus this time when I flew US Airways.</p>
<p>Let me just say, the difference between the two carriers is night and day. Now. Don&#8217;t know how Air NZ&#8217;s local flights within Kiwiland are, but I am comparing my international Los Angeles to Europe experience.</p>
<p>Basic differences:</p>
<p>1) Air NZ was a Boeing 777 compared to US Airways smaller Boeing 757.</p>
<p>2) NZ had a personal TV for each passenger. US had no TV on the first leg from LA to Philly and a cental TV or the second leg to Lisbon. The entertainment? Try the worst movie I have seen this year; Duplicity!</p>
<p>3) Meals &#8211; sigh. NZ had gourmet meals served free of charge. US charged for meals during the first leg, and the complimentary meal on the second was worse than stale fast food. I mean surely they try this food before signing on the contract chef? It would be cheaper for them to serve McDonalds. And I promise you, that would have tasted better even if you are not a fan of McDobalds. So why the faccad with a lame excuse for gourmet food. Spare me the tray and the butter.</p>
<p>4) Every international airline I have traveled in the past has provided at least free wine with and after dinner. Not this US carrier. $7 for a small cheap bottle of local wine. And I am not even a wine snob.</p>
<p>5) NZ had much more leg room. These guys did not.</p>
<p>Now why did I take this flight? Well it not like they were cheaper than the BA flight I almost booked a couple of days before, but it had the dates of travel I preferred. Knowing what I know now, I can promise you one thing. My future international trips will not involve an American carrier. And I dont think this is just a US Airways problem. I think it&#8217;s more of a culture thing that all US carriers have gone through and while the stingy attitude is acceptable on kcal flights, they need to do a much better job on international flights if they want to compete with any of their international peers.</p>
<p>Avoid all US carriers for international routes. Lesson learnt!</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://travelandtweet.com/2009/08/air-new-zealand-lax-to-london.html" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Consider Air New Zealand for non-stop Los Angeles to London</a></li><li><a href="http://travelandtweet.com/2011/12/groupon-getaway-deal.html" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Getaway Deals on Groupon Don&#8217;t Add Up</a></li><li><a href="http://travelandtweet.com/2009/08/jetblue-in-the-news-with-a-fabulous-deal.html" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">JetBlue in the news with a Fabulous Deal</a></li><li><a href="http://travelandtweet.com/2008/08/credit-cards-for-frequent-travellers.html" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Credit Cards for Frequent Travelers</a></li><li><a href="http://travelandtweet.com/2009/06/getting-around-europe.html" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Getting Around Europe</a></li></ul></div><div class="shr-publisher-228"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://travelandtweet.com/2009/09/us-air-carriers-way-behind-their-international-peers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

